Skip to main content
  • Catholic Theologians Support Elephant Rights Case
  • Appeal Sought in New York Elephant Rights Case
  • Help #FreeHappy
  • Help #FreeMinnie
  • 2020 Annual Report
  • NhRP Seminar Series
  • NhRP Interview Series
  • Laurence Tribe: “It’s time to bring elephants into the circle of rightsholders”
<
>
Blog

Back to nonhumanrights.org

  • Donate

Back to nonhumanrights.org

  • About NhRP
    • Meet the Team
    • FAQ
    • Media Center
    • Contact Us
  • Our Work
    • Litigation
    • Legislation + Advocacy
    • Education
  • Progress
  • Blog

Issues

Why “Animal Rights” Is a Contradiction in Terms

By Michael Mountain on March 23, 2013
Share this story:

Hundreds of organizations say they work for “animal rights.” But the only animal with legal rights is the human animal. No other animal has any rights at all. None.

How come?

To have a legal right, one must have the “legal capacity” for a right. If one has this capacity for a legal right, one is a legal “person.” No nonhuman animal has been recognized as a legal “person.” This means that no animals, other than humans, have legal rights.

The only animal with legal rights is the human animal. No other animal has any rights at all.
Statutes provide some protection for some nonhuman animals. It may be illegal to starve a circus elephant or withhold medical care from a chimpanzee in a zoo. But the elephant and the chimpanzee have no legal right to that kind of care (similarly, there are statutes that prevent you from stealing someone’s car, but the car itself has no legal rights, since the car is not a legal person with the capacity for any legal right).

The Nonhuman Rights Project is determined to cut the Gordian Knot that binds every nonhuman animal to perpetual rightlessness. Judicial acceptance of the overwhelming scientific evidence and strong legal arguments why our nonhuman plaintiff is a legal “person” with the capacity for legal rights will open the first crack in the legal wall that has for so long separated humans from every other animal.

At that point the term “animal rights” will begin to carry real meaning, and we will begin to argue which legal specific rights a nonhuman animal should have.

Must Reads

  • Nonhuman Rights in Colombia: An Interview with Luis Domingo Gómez Maldonado in Interviews
  • Why Happy needs and deserves sanctuary in Campaigns, Cases
  • The Need for Chimpanzee Rights in Stories
  • Building An International Nonhuman Rights Movement in Collaborations
  • Upholding Fundamental Values and Principles of Justice in Stories
  • NhRP Addresses Highest Court in Colombia in Chucho Bear Rights Case in News

Get Involved

Subscribe to our email list to receive updates and learn about events and volunteer opportunities in your area.

Nonhuman Rights Project

We are the only civil rights organization in the United States dedicated solely to securing rights for nonhuman animals.

Sign up to receive updates

© 2021 Nonhuman Rights Project, all rights reserved.

  • Privacy

Follow us to get updates