Skip to main content
  • Our New Client in Our First California Lawsuit 
  • LA Times: “For too long, we’ve salved our consciences with tepid animal welfare laws”
  • “The most important animal-rights case of the 21st century”
  • NhRP Seminar Series
  • NhRP Interview Series
<
>
Blog

Back to nonhumanrights.org

  • Donate
  • Shop   ↗

Back to nonhumanrights.org

  • About NhRP
    • Meet the Team
    • Our Story
    • FAQ
    • Unlocking the Cage
    • Media Center
    • Contact Us
  • Our Work
    • Litigation
    • Legislation + Advocacy
    • Education
    • The Fight to #FreeTheFresnoElephants
    • Free Happy Now
  • Progress
  • Blog
Photo: Debbie Berg

Issues and Analysis

NhRP Statement on NEAVS V. USFWS

By Lauren Choplin on September 17, 2016
Share this story:

“The injured have no rights, and those with rights are not injured.” – Steven M. Wise, founder and President, the Nonhuman Rights Project

On Sept. 15, a federal district judge in Washington, D.C. dismissed the New England Anti-Vivisection Society’s lawsuit alleging that the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision to grant export licenses to ship eight chimpanzees from Yerkes National Primate Research Center to an unaccredited English zoo violated numerous federal statutes. The Court’s decision makes clear that the plaintiffs’ allegations were substantial and deserved the attention of a federal court, but were never going to receive that attention because the plaintiffs lacked standing. That is to say, the human plaintiffs were not injured—only the chimpanzees.

As the Court acknowledged at the beginning of its decision, dismissal of a case on these grounds is a familiar issue for animal advocates: “[t]he question of who can speak for the animals has long vexed federal judges in animal welfare cases.” The Court also noted how difficult it is “to apply settled standing doctrine to determine when and under what circumstances an act that is allegedly harmful to animal works a cognizable injury in fact to humans.”

We heartily applaud the efforts of NEAVS and its co-plaintiffs in litigating this important case. But the fact remains that federal courts often dismiss cases involving allegations of injury to humans in “animal welfare” cases for lack of standing. So long as there are only “animal welfare” cases, these dismissals are never going to stop, for a fatal and inherent contradiction exists. The injured have no rights, and those with rights are not injured.

This contradiction catalyzed the formation of the Nonhuman Rights Project years ago. It is the reason we fight to establish actual legal rights for nonhuman animals. Their “standing” will automatically follow as they transform from legal “things” to legal “persons.” Only then will their interests—separate from our interests in them—become visible to our legal system.

Lauren is the NhRP’s Communications Director. She heads up internal and external communications, coordinating media coverage of our legal and policy work and managing our blog and social media pages.

Must Reads

  • Why Happy needs and deserves sanctuary in Court Cases, Grassroots Advocacy
  • Amicus support for the fight to #FreeHappy in Court Cases
  • Where is Tommy the Chimp? in News
  • Why We Fight for Nonhuman Rights: Sk’aliCh’elh-tenaut’s Story Part 1 in Stories
  • “The key is ending injustice, period” in Interviews

Get Involved

Subscribe to our email list to receive updates and learn about events and volunteer opportunities in your area.

Nonhuman Rights Project

We are the only civil rights organization in the United States dedicated solely to securing rights for nonhuman animals.

5195 NW 112th Terrace
Coral Springs, FL 33076
Tax ID #: 04-3289466

Sign up to receive updates

© 2023 Nonhuman Rights Project, all rights reserved.

  • Privacy

Follow us to get updates