Skip to main content
  • Our New Client in Our First California Lawsuit 
  • LA Times: “For too long, we’ve salved our consciences with tepid animal welfare laws”
  • “The most important animal-rights case of the 21st century”
  • NhRP Seminar Series
  • NhRP Interview Series
<
>
Blog

Back to nonhumanrights.org

  • Donate
  • Shop   ↗

Back to nonhumanrights.org

  • About NhRP
    • Meet the Team
    • Our Story
    • FAQ
    • Unlocking the Cage
    • Media Center
    • Contact Us
  • Our Work
    • Litigation
    • Legislation + Advocacy
    • Education
    • The Fight to #FreeTheFresnoElephants
    • Free Happy Now
  • Progress
  • Blog
Photo: Happy the elephant stands in the Bronx Zoo elephant exhibit (October 2021). Credit Gigi Glendinning

Cases

NhRP Reply to AZA Arguments in Legal Fight to #FreeHappy

By Lauren Choplin on February 25, 2022
Share this story:

Today in Happy’s historic elephant rights case, the NhRP filed a reply to an amicus curiae brief submitted in support of the Wildlife Conservation Society and the Bronx Zoo by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and six AZA-accredited New York zoos and aquariums. As we write:

Historically, not all humans could invoke habeas corpus. The common law writ’s protections were extended over time to remedy injustices in cases involving enslaved humans, women, children, and the infirm. The injustice of Happy’s imprisonment at the Bronx Zoo requires this Court to extend the writ’s protections and grant her habeas relief. Amici Curiae would have this Court freeze habeas corpus and ignore the profound role it has played in remedying past injustices.

The AZA brief attempts to argue, among other things, that ruling in Happy’s favor would “wreak havoc on society.”

Latin for “friend of the court,” an amicus curiae (plural: amici curiae) requests permission from a court to advise it regarding a matter of law. An amicus curiae can be a person, an entity like a business, a nonprofit, a trade association, or the government, or a group of people or entities.

In addition to the affidavits submitted by elephant cognition and behavior experts at the outset of our litigation, the NhRP’s legal fight for Happy’s freedom has gained the support of experts on habeas corpus, animal law, philosophy, and more in the form of amicus curiae briefs. At this link is a summary of each brief submitted in support of  Happy’s right to liberty and release to a sanctuary.

For a detailed timeline of Happy’s case, court filings, and decisions, visit this page. Find all the latest on the fight for Happy’s freedom and ways to take action on our new Free Happy campaign page.

Lauren is the NhRP’s Communications Director. She heads up internal and external communications, coordinating media coverage of our legal and policy work and managing our blog and social media pages.

Must Reads

  • Why Happy needs and deserves sanctuary in Campaigns, Cases
  • Amicus Support for the Fight to #FreeHappy in Cases
  • Where is Tommy the Chimp? in News
  • Why We Fight for Nonhuman Rights: Sk’aliCh’elh-tenaut’s Story Part 1 in Stories
  • “The key is ending injustice, period” in Interviews

Get Involved

Subscribe to our email list to receive updates and learn about events and volunteer opportunities in your area.

Nonhuman Rights Project

We are the only civil rights organization in the United States dedicated solely to securing rights for nonhuman animals.

5195 NW 112th Terrace
Coral Springs, FL 33076
Tax ID #: 04-3289466

Sign up to receive updates

© 2023 Nonhuman Rights Project, all rights reserved.

  • Privacy

Follow us to get updates