Skip to main content
  • Our New Client in Our First California Lawsuit 
  • LA Times: “For too long, we’ve salved our consciences with tepid animal welfare laws”
  • “The most important animal-rights case of the 21st century”
  • NhRP Seminar Series
  • NhRP Interview Series
<
>
Blog

Back to nonhumanrights.org

  • Donate
  • Shop   ↗

Back to nonhumanrights.org

  • About NhRP
    • Meet the Team
    • Our Story
    • FAQ
    • Unlocking the Cage
    • Media Center
    • Contact Us
  • Our Work
    • Litigation
    • Legislation + Advocacy
    • Education
    • The Fight to #FreeTheFresnoElephants
    • Free Happy Now
  • Progress
  • Blog
Photo: Evgenia Kononova for Wikimedia

Issues and Analysis, News

Constitutional Court of Ecuador Urged to Recognize Animals As Rightsholders

By Nonhuman Rights on December 14, 2021
Share this story:

With the Constitutional Court of Ecuador set to rule for the first time on the question of nonhuman animals’ legal status, The Brooks McCormick Jr. Animal Law & Policy Program at Harvard Law School (ALPP) and the Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) have jointly filed an amicus curiae brief with the Court, urging it to recognize that nonhuman animals can have legal rights.

“In this time of catastrophic climate crisis and the sixth mass extinction of species, Ecuador is a regional and world leader in developing and protecting the rights of nature and this case presents an opportunity to deepen that reputation,” the ALPP and the NhRP write in the brief. “The case is also novel and important for the development of habeas corpus and its application to nonhuman animals in Ecuador, Latin America, and globally.”

The Constitutional Court decided to take up the issue of nonhuman animals’ legal status in response to a habeas corpus case involving a woolly monkey named Estrellita. Drawing on the authors’ shared expertise and interest in the consideration of nonhuman animals’ legal status, the brief argues that habeas corpus can apply to nonhuman animals, that individual nonhuman animals have rights under the rights of nature framework adopted in the Ecuadorian Constitution, and that the Court should order the relevant governmental entities to create protocols to guarantee the rights of nonhuman animals, whether derived under the rights of nature or directly through access to the writ of habeas corpus.

The brief points to the scientific evidence of the cognitive and social complexity of woolly monkeys and argues that they “should at minimum possess the right to bodily liberty” and that “the environmental authority should have protected Estrellita’s rights by examining her specific circumstances before placing her in the zoo.”

Estrellita was poached from the wild when she was one month old and lived as the private pet of Ana Burbano for nearly two decades. In 2019, authorities seized Estrellita and relocated her to the San Martín de Baños Zoo under a law passed in 2017 that bans private individuals from breeding, keeping, buying, or selling exotic or native wildlife. Estrellita died in quarantine in the zoo and Burbano filed a habeas corpus petition on Estrellita’s behalf. The lower court and the Court of Appeals denied the request for habeas relief. The ALPP and NhRP as amicus authors affirm that individuals should not keep wild animals as pets but take the position that habeas corpus should be available to a woolly monkey such as Estrellita so that, through a representative, she could have challenged her detention in a zoo or other confinement before she died.

Ecuador is the first country in the world to recognize the rights of nature at the constitutional level. On Dec. 2, in what is being hailed as a landmark ruling, the Constitutional Court prohibited mining in the Los Cedros Protected Forest under the rights of nature.

A ruling in the case is expected in the coming months.

Download the brief in its original Spanish here. Download the brief in English here. Read this announcement in Spanish here.

***

The Brooks McCormick Jr. Animal Law & Policy Program at Harvard Law School is committed to analyzing and improving the treatment of animals by the legal system. For more information, visit animal.law.harvard.edu. Professor and Faculty Director Kristen Stilt and Rights Research Fellow Macarena Montes contributed on behalf of the ALPP.

The Nonhuman Rights Project is the only civil rights organization in the United States dedicated solely to securing rights for nonhuman animals. President Steven M. Wise and Executive Director Kevin Schneider contributed on behalf of the NhRP.

Must Reads

  • Why Happy needs and deserves sanctuary in Court Cases, Grassroots Advocacy
  • Amicus support for the fight to #FreeHappy in Court Cases
  • Where is Tommy the Chimp? in News
  • Why We Fight for Nonhuman Rights: Sk’aliCh’elh-tenaut’s Story Part 1 in Stories
  • “The key is ending injustice, period” in Interviews

Get Involved

Subscribe to our email list to receive updates and learn about events and volunteer opportunities in your area.

Nonhuman Rights Project

We are the only civil rights organization in the United States dedicated solely to securing rights for nonhuman animals.

5195 NW 112th Terrace
Coral Springs, FL 33076
Tax ID #: 04-3289466

Sign up to receive updates

© 2023 Nonhuman Rights Project, all rights reserved.

  • Privacy

Follow us to get updates