Skip to main content
  • Ruling Expected Soon in Fresno Elephant Rights Case
  • Happy the person (AEON)
  • NhRP Supports New Bill to End the Capture And Breeding of Whales for Public Display
  • LA Times: “For too long, we’ve salved our consciences with tepid animal welfare laws”
  • Legal Fight to Free Happy Continues in New York
  • “The most important animal-rights case of the 21st century”
  • NhRP Seminar Series
  • NhRP Interview Series
<
>
Blog

Back to nonhumanrights.org

  • Donate
  • Shop   ↗

Back to nonhumanrights.org

  • About NhRP
    • Meet the Team
    • Our Story
    • FAQ
    • Unlocking the Cage
    • Media Center
    • Contact Us
  • Our Work
    • Litigation
    • Legislation + Advocacy
    • Education
    • The Fight to #FreeTheFresnoElephants
    • Free Happy Now
  • Progress
  • Blog

Cases

Venue for Fresno Case to be Determined Soon

By Jake Davis on September 8, 2022
Share this story:

On Wednesday, the NhRP filed a “Reply in Support of Motion for an Order Returning Matter to San Francisco County Superior Court” (or, “Reply” for short) in our first California nonhuman rights case, which seeks to #FreeTheFresnoElephants to a sanctuary.

As the Reply’s full caption notes, the NhRP continues to petition the Fresno Superior Court to return this case to the San Francisco Superior Court. The NhRP makes this argument on the grounds that the reason given by the San Francisco Superior Court for transferring this case to Fresno was improper.

California law makes clear that absent a specific showing as defined by the California Rules of Court, a petition for writ of habeas corpus must be resolved in the court where it was filed, regardless of which court that is. Since this showing was not made, the NhRP seeks the petition’s return to San Francisco, the court where this case was originally filed.

On Sept. 14th, the NhRP will argue these very points in front of Judge Mark Cullers of the Fresno Superior Court. If Judge Cullers follows the law, this case will return to San Francisco. If Judge Cullers denies the NhRP’s transfer back request, the case will play out in Fresno. Either way, come Sept. 14th, the dispute on where this case will be heard should come to an end. When that happens, the petition itself can be reviewed in earnest. This means either Judge Cullers or a judge in San Francisco will decide whether Amahle, Nolwazi, and Vusmusi should be sent to a sanctuary where they can (finally) exercise their autonomy while living a life as close to what nature intended as is possible for them in the United States.

For a detailed timeline of Nolwazi, Amahle, and Vusmusi’s case, court filings, and decisions, visit this page. Find all the latest on the fight for Nolwazi, Amahle, and Vusmusi’s freedom and ways to take action on our #FreeTheFresnoElephants campaign page.

Jake Davis is an NhRP staff attorney.

Must Reads

  • Why Happy needs and deserves sanctuary in Campaigns, Cases
  • Amicus Support for the Fight to #FreeHappy in Cases
  • Where is Tommy the Chimp? in News
  • Why We Fight for Nonhuman Rights: Sk’aliCh’elh-tenaut’s Story Part 1 in Stories
  • “The key is ending injustice, period” in Interviews

Get Involved

Subscribe to our email list to receive updates and learn about events and volunteer opportunities in your area.

Nonhuman Rights Project

We are the only civil rights organization in the United States dedicated solely to securing rights for nonhuman animals.

5195 NW 112th Terrace
Coral Springs, FL 33076
Tax ID #: 04-3289466

Sign up to receive updates

© 2023 Nonhuman Rights Project, all rights reserved.

  • Privacy

Follow us to get updates